Результаты хирургического лечения рецидивирующих макулярных разрывов

    1. Алпатов С.А. Хирургическое лечение сквозных макулярных разрывов большого диаметра / Офтальмохирургия – 2005. – № 1. – С. 8–12.

    2. Алпатов С.А., Щуко А.Г., Малышев В.В. Идиопатические макулярные разрывы. – Новосибирск: Наука, 2002. – 109 с.

    3. Бикбов М.М., Алтынбаев У.Р., Гильманшин Т.Р. Выбор способа интраоперационного закрытия идиопатического макулярного разрыва большого диаметра / Офтальмохирургия. – 2010. – № 1. – С. 25–28.

    4. Alberti M., la Cour M. Nonsupine positioning in macular hole surgery: a noninferiority randomized clinical trial / Retina Phila PA. – 2016. – Vol. 36, № 11. – P. 2072–2079.

    5. Duker J.S., Wendel R., Patel A.C., Puliafito C.A. Late reopening of macular holes after initially successful treatment with vitreous surgery / Ophthalmology. – 1994. – Vol. 101, № 8. – P. 1373–1378.

    6. Eckardt C., Eckardt U., Groos S. et al. Removal of the internal limiting membrane in macular holes. Clinical and morphological findings / Ophthalmologe. – 1997. – Vol. 94, № 8. – P. 545–551.

    7. Haritoglou C., Gandorfer A., Gass C.A. et al. The effect of indocyanine-green on functional outcome of macular pucker surgery / Am J Ophthalmol. – 2003. – Vol. 135, № 3. – P. 328–337.

    8. Hillenkamp J., Saikia P., Herrmann W.A. et al. Surgical removal of idiopathic epiretinal membrane with or without the assistance of indocyanine green: a randomised controlled clinical trial / Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. – 2007. – Vol. 245, № 7. – P. 973–979.

    9. Ip M.S., Baker B.J., Duker J.S. et al. Anatomical outcomes of surgery for idiopathic macular hole as determined by optical coherence tomography / Arch Ophthalmol. – 2002. – Vol. 120, № 1. – P. 29–35.

    10. Kokame G.T. Recurrence of macular holes / Ophthalmology. –1995. – Vol. 102, № 2. – P. 172–173.

    11. Meuer S.M., Myers C.E., Klein B.E.K. et al. The epidemiology of vitreoretinal interface abnormalities as detected by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: the beaver dam eye study / Ophthalmology. – 2015. – Vol. 122, № 4. – P. 787–795.

    12. Park D.W., Sipperley J.O., Sneed S.R. et al. Macular hole surgery with internal-limiting membrane peeling and intravitreous air / Ophthalmology. – 1999. – Vol. 106, № 7. – P. 1392–1397.

    13. Patel S.C., Loo R.H., Thompson J.T., Sjaarda R.N. Macular hole surgery in high myopia / Ophthalmology. – 2001. – Vol. 108, № 2. – P. 377–380.

    14. Pearce I.A., Branley M., Groenewald C. et al. Visual function and patient satisfaction after macular hole surgery / Eye. – 1998. – Vol. 12. – P. 651–658.

    15. Rahmani B., Tielsch J.M., Katz J. et al. The causespecific prevalence of visual impairment in an urban population / Baltim Eye Survey Ophthalmol. – 1996. – Vol. 103, № 11. – P. 1721–1726.

    16. Ryan E.H., Gilbert H.D. Results of surgical treatment of recent-onset full-thickness idiopathic macular holes / Arch Ophthalmol Chic Ill. – 1994. – Vol. 112, № 12. – P. 1545–1553.

    17. Sen P., Bhargava A., Vijaya L., George R. Prevalence of idiopathic macular hole in adult rural and urban south Indian population / Clin Exp Ophthalmol. – 2008. – Vol. 36, № 3. – P. 257–260.

    18. Sheidow T.G., Blinder K.J., Holekamp N. et al. Outcome results in macular hole surgery: an evaluation of internal limiting membrane peeling with and without indocyanine green / Ophthalmology. – 2003. – Vol. 110, № 9. – С. 1697–1701.

    19. Smiddy W.E., Feuer W., Cordahi G. Internal limiting membrane peeling in macular hole surgery / Ophthalmology. – 2001. – Vol. 108, № 8. – P. 1471–1476.

    20. Ullrich S., Haritoglou C., Gass C. et al. Macular hole size as a prognostic factor in macular hole surgery / Br J Ophthalmol. – 2002. – Vol. 86, № 4. – P. 390–393.

    21. Valldeperas X., Wong D. Is it worth reoperating on macular holes? / Ophthalmology. – 2008. – Vol. 115, № 1. – P. 158–163.

    22. Vaziri K., Schwartz S.G., Kishor K.S. et al. Rates of reoperation and retinal detachment after macular hole surgery / Ophthalmology. – 2016. – Vol. 123, № 1. – P. 26–31.