Современные аспекты этиопатогенеза и диагностики синдрома сухого глаза у пациентов рефракционного профиля

    1. Дога А.В., Мушкова И.А., Семенов А.Д. и др. Этапы развития и современные аспекты кераторефракционной хирургии. Практическая медицина. 2016;6(98): 36–41. [Doga AV, Mushkova IA, Semenov AD, et al. Stages of development and modern aspects of keratorefractive surgery. Practical Medicine. 2016;6(98): 36–41. (In Russ.)]

    2. Edward YW, Leung A, Rao S, Lam DS. Effect of laser in situ keratomileusis on tear stability. Ophthalmology. 2000;107(12): 2131–2135. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00388-2

    3. Gipson IK, Argueso P, Beuerman R, et al. Research in dry eye: Report of the Research Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye WorkShop. Ocular Surface. 2007;5: 179–193. doi:10.1016/S1542-0124(12)70086-1

    4. Perry HD, Donnenfeld ED. Dry eye diagnosis and management in 2004. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2004;15: 299–304. doi: 10.1097/00055735-200408000-00004

    5. Дога А.В., Майчук Н.В., Мушкова И.А., Бабицкая И.А. Комплексный подход к ведению пациентов с рецидивирующими эрозиями роговицы. Офтальмология. 2021;18(2): 338–345. [Doga AV, Maychuk NV, Mushkova IA, Babitskaya IA. A comprehensive approach to the management of patients with recurrent corneal erosions. Ophthalmology. 2021;18(2): 338–345. (In Russ.)] doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2021-2- 338-345.

    6. Denoyer A, Landman E, Trinh L, et al. Dry eye disease after refractive surgery: Comparative outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction versus LASIK. Ophthalmology. 2015;122: 669–676. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.10.004

    7. Solomon KD, de Castro LE, Sandoval HP, et al. LASIK Study Task Force LASIK world literature review: Quality of life and patient satisfaction. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(4): 691–701. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.12.037

    8. Hamdi IM. Effect of D-Panthenol on corneal epithelial healing after surface laser ablation. J Ophthalmol. 2018;2018: 6537413. doi: 10.1155/2018/6537413

    9. Gatta AL, Corsuto L, Salzillo R, et al. In vitro evaluation of hybrid cooperative complexes of hyaluronic acid as a potential new ophthalmic treatment. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2018;34(10): 677–684. doi: 10.1089/jop.2018.0046

    10. Novack GD, Asbell P, Barabino S, et al. FOS DEWS II Clinical Trial Design Report. Ocul Surf. Author manuscript. 2017;15(3): 629–649. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.009

    11. Хан К. «Синдром сухого глаза»: практический подход. Пер. с англ.; под ред. В.В. Бржеского. М.; 2021: 12–13. [Khan K. “Dry eye syndrome”: a practical approach. Translated from English; ed. by VV Brezhsky. Moscow; 2021: 12–13. (In Russ.)]

    12. Горенков Р.В., Рябцева А.А., Агафонов Б.В. и др. Синдром сухого глаза в общей врачебной практике. Лекции для врачей. Эффективная фармакотерапия. 2019;15(33): 30–36. [Gorenkov RV, Ryabtseva AA, Agafonov BV, et al. Dry eye syndrome in general medical practice. Lectures for doctors. Effective Pharmacotherapy. 2019;15(33): 30–36. (In Russ.)] doi: 10.33978/2307-3586-2019-15-33-30-36

    13. Lemp MA. Report of the National eye institute/industry workshop on clinical trials in dry eyes. CLAO J. 1995;21(4): 221–232. PMID: 8565190

    14. The definition and classification of dry eye disease: report of the Definition and Classification Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye WorkShop (2007). Ocul Surf. 2007;5(2): 75–92. doi: 10.1016/s1542-0124(12)70081-2

    15. Cclasraig JP, Nichols KK, Akpek EK, et al. TFOS DEWS II definition and sification report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(3): 276–283. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.008

    16. Kobashi H, Kamiya K, Shimizu K. Dry eye after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK: Meta-analysis. Cornea. 2017;36(1): 85–91. doi:10.1097/ ICO.0000000000000999

    17. Bower KS, Sia RK, Ryan DS, et al. Chronic dry eye in photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis: Manifestations, incidence, and predictive factors. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(12): 2624–2634. doi: 10.1016/j. jcrs.2015.06.037

    18. Lee B, Mclaren J, Eric J, et al. Reinnervation in the cornea after LASIK. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43(12): 3660–3664. PMID: 12454033

    19. Szczesna DH, Kulas Z, Kasprzak HT, Stenevi U. Examination of tear film smoothness on corneae after refractive surgeries using a non-invasive interferometric method. J Biomed Opt. 2009;14(6): 064029. doi: 10.1117/1.3275850

    20. Konomi K, Chen LL, Tarko RS, et al. Preoperative characteristics and a potential mechanism of chronic dry eye after LASIK. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(1): 168–174. doi: 10.1167/ iovs.07-0337

    21. Бржеский В.В. Синдром сухого глаза – болезнь цивилизации. Современные возможности диагностики и лечения. Медицинский совет. 2013;3: 114–120. [Brzhesky VV. Dry eye syndrome is a disease of civilization. Modern diagnostic and treatment capabilities. Medical advice. 2013;3: 114–120. (In Russ.)]

    22. Willcox P, Argueso P, Georgiev GA, et al. TFOS DEWS II Tear Film Report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(3): 366–403. doi: 10.1016/j. jtos.2017.03.006

    23. Xue W, Zhu MM, Zhu BJ, et al. Long-term impact of dry eye symptoms on vision-related quality of life after phacoemulsification surgery. Int Ophthalmol. 2018;39(2): 419–429. doi: 10.1007/s10792-018-0828-z

    24. Bennett TJ, Barry CJ. Ophthalmic imaging today: an ophthalmic photographer’s viewpoint – A review. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2009;37(1): 2–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2008.01812.x

    25. Fan R, Chan TC, Prakash G, Jhanji V. Applications of corneal topography and tomography: A review. Clin. Experiment. Ophthalmol. 2018;46: 133–146. doi: 10.1111/ceo.13136

    26. Uchino E, Sonoda S, Nakao K, Sakamoto T. Alteration of tear cytokine balance by eye closure: analysis by multicytokine assay. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006;244(6): 747– 749. doi: 10.1007/s00417-005-0127-z

    27. Sobrin L, Liu Z, Monroy DC, et al. Regulation of MMP-9 activity in human tear fluid and corneal epithelial cuture supernatant. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41(7): 1703–1709.

    28. Runzhong F, Klinngam W, Heur M, et al. Tear proteases and protease inhibitors: potential biomarkers and disease drivers in ocular surface disease. Eye Contact Lens. 2021;46(2): 70–83. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000641

    29. Нагорский П.Г. Клинико-лабораторное обоснование применения ортокератологических линз при прогрессирующей миопии у детей. Дис. … канд. мед. наук. М.; 2014. [Nagorsky PG. Clinical and laboratory justification of the use of orthokeratological lenses in progressive myopia in children. [Dissertation]. M.; 2014. (In Russ.)]

    30. Патент РФ на изобретение №.2427324/27.08.2011. Бюл. №24. Аскерова С.М., Бирюкова Ю.Е. Способ взятия нестимулированной слезной жидкости. Доступно по: https:// www1.fips.ru/iiss/document.xhtml?faces-redirect=true&id= 944d9073c58488357dc7aa8d9aaa876d. [Ссылка активна на 18.03.2010]. [Patent RUS №2427324/27.08.2011. Byul. №24. Askerova SM, Biryukova YuE. Method of taking unstimulated lacrimal fluid. Available from: https://www1.fips.ru/iiss/ document.xhtml?faces-redirect=true&id=944d9073c58488 357dc7aa8d9aaa876d. [Accessed 18th March 2010] (In Russ.)]

    31. Патент на изобретение №2281740/20.08.2006. Бюл. № 23. Бржеский В.В., Сомов Е.Е. Способ хирургического лечения больных с синдромом сухого глаза. Доступно по: https:// www1.fips.ru/iiss/document.xhtml?faces-redirect=true&id= 4f41211eed23d6a96da6dee374ed89d8. [Ссылка активна на 20.08.2006]. [Patent RUS №2281740/20.08.2006. Byul № 23. Brzhesky VV, Somov EE. Method of surgical treatment of patients with dry eye syndrome. [Accessed 20th August 2006] (In Russ.)]

    32. Красногорская В.Н. Красный глаз. Учеб. пособ. Благовещенск; 2018: 83–91. [Krasnogorskaya VN. Red eye. Textbook. Blagoveshchensk; 2018: 83–91. (In Russ.)]

    33. Попов В.Ю. Возможности местной противовоспалительной терапии в комплексном лечении больных с синдромом «сухого глаза». Дис. … канд. мед. наук. СПб.; 2020. [Popov VYu. The possibilities of local anti-inflammatory therapy in the complex treatment of patients with dry eye syndrome. [Dissertation]. St. Petersburg; 2020. (In Russ.)]

    34. Doughty MJ. Goblet cell density estimate differences in impression cytology samples varies with different magnification of images. Contact Lens and Anterior Eye. 2018;41(3): 290–296. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2017.12.002