Выяснение частоты неэффективности кросслинкинга при лечении первичного прогрессирующего кератоконуса, предварительная оценка ее предикторов

    Литература/References

    1. Mohd-Ali B, Abdu M, Yaw CY, et al. Clinical characteristics of keratoconus patients in Malaysia: a review from a cornea specialist centre. J Optom. 2012;5(1): 38–42. doi: 10.1016/j. optom.2012.01.002

    2. Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol. 1998;42(4): 297–319. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6257(97)00119-7

    3. Терещенко А.В., Демьянченко С.К, Тимофеев М.А. Кератоконус (обзор). Саратовский научно-медицинский журнал. 2020;16(1): 293–297. [Tereshchenko AV, Demyanchenko SK, Timofeev MA. Keratoconus (review). Saratov Journal of Medical Scientific Research. 2020;16(1): 293–297. (In Russ.)]

    4. Caporossi A, Baiocchi S, Mazzotta C, et al. Parasurgical therapy for keratoconus by riboflavin-ultraviolet type A rays induced cross-linking of corneal collagen: preliminary refractive results in an Italian study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32(5): 837–845. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.01.091

    5. Asri D, Touboul D, Fournié P, et al. Corneal collagen crosslinking in progressive keratoconus: multicenter results from the French National Reference Center for Keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(12): 2137–2143. doi: 10.1016/j. jcrs.2011.08.026

    6. Копаенко А.И., Расин О.Г. Кросслинкинг роговичного коллагена – современные тенденции в практическом применении. Таврический медико-биологический вестник. 2020;23(3): 98–107. [Kopaenko AI, Rasin OG. Corneal collagen cross-linking – current trends in practice applications. Tavricheskiy medico-biologicheskiy vestnik. 2020;23(3): 98–107. (In Russ.)] doi: 10.37279/2070-8092- 2020-23-3-98-107

    7. Солодкова, Е.Г., Ремесников И.А. Анализ отдаленных результатов кросслинкинга роговичного коллагена при лечении прогрессирующего кератоконуса. Практическая медицина. 2012;(4-1): 118–120. [Solodkova EG, Remesnikov IA. Analysis of remote results corneal collagen crosslinking in treatment of progressive keratoconus. Practical Medicine. 2012;(4-1): 118–120. (In Russ.)]

    8. Kymionis GD, Portaliou DM, Diakonis VF, et al. Corneal collagen cross-linking with riboflavin and ultraviolet-A irradiation in patients with thin corneas. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153(1): 24–28. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.05.036

    9. Зотов В.В., Паштаев Н.П., Поздеева Н.А. Кросслинкинг роговичного коллагена в лечении кератоконуса. Вестник офтальмологии. 2015;131(4): 88–93. [Zotov VV, Pashtaev NP, Pozdeeva NA. Corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2015;131(4): 88–93. (In Russ.)] doi: 10.17116/oftalma2015131488-93

    10. Васильева И.В., Егоров В.В., Васильев А.В. Анализ безопасности и эффективности комбинированного лечения кератоконуса. Современные технологии в офтальмологии. 2016;2: 158–162. [Vasilieva IV, Egorov VV, Vasiliev AV. Analysis of safety and efficacy of combined treatment of keratoconus. Modern technologies in ophthalmology. 2016;2: 158–162. (In Russ.)]

    11. Chow VW, Chan TC, Yu M, et al. One-year outcomes of conventional and accelerated collagen crosslinking in progressive keratoconus. Sci Rep. 2015;5: 14425. doi: 10.1038/ srep14425

    12. Vinciguerra P, Albè E, Trazza S, et al. Refractive, topographic, tomographic, and aberrometric analysis of keratoconic eyes undergoing corneal cross-linking. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(3): 369–378. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.09.048

    13. Vinciguerra P, Albè E, Trazza S, et al. Intraoperative and postoperative effects of corneal collagen cross-linking on progressive keratoconus. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127(10): 1258–1265. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.205

    14. Gutiérrez R, Lopez I, Villa-Collar C, et al. Corneal transparency after cross-linking for keratoconus: 1-year follow-up. J Refract Surg. 2012;28(11): 781–786. doi: 10.3928/1081597X20121011-06

    15. Бикбов М.М., Суркова В.К., Усубов Э.Л, Титоян К.Х. Оценка значимости показателей проекционного сканирующего кератотопографа в диагностике субклинического кератоконуса. РМЖ. Клиническая офтальмология. 2017;17(3): 145–149. [Bikbov MM, Surkova VK, Usubov EL, Titoian KKh. Assessment of the significance of the keratotopography scanner in the diagnosis of subclinical keratoconus. RMJ. Clinical ophthalmology. 2017;17(3): 145–149. (In Russ.)]

    16. Greenstein SA, Shah VP, Fry KL, Hersh PS. Corneal thickness changes after corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus and corneal ectasia: one-year results J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(4): 691–700. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.10.052

    17. Pinelli R, Mometto C. Corneal epithelium: should it stay or should it go? Ophthalmology Times Europe. 2007;3(3).

    18. Shalchi Z, Wang X, Nanavaty MA. Safety and efficacy of epithelium removal and transepithelial corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus. Eye (Lond). 2015;29(1): 15–29. doi: 10.1038/eye.2014.230

    19. Poli M, Lefevre A, Auxenfans C, Burillon C. Corneal Collagen Cross-linking for the Treatment of Progressive Corneal Ectasia: 6-Year Prospective Outcome in a French Population. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;160(4): 654–662.e1. doi: 10.1016/j. ajo.2015.06.027

    20. Егорова Г.Б., Рогова А.Я. Кератоконус. Методы диагностики и мониторинга. Вестник офтальмологии. 2013;129(1): 61–66. [Egorova GB, Rogova AIa. Keratoconus. Diagnostic and monitoring methods. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2013;129(1): 61–66. (In Russ.)].

    21. Wittig-Silva C, Chan E, Islam FM, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of corneal collagen cross-linking in progressive keratoconus: three-year results Ophthalmology. 2014;121(4): 812–821. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.10.028

    22. Sykakis E, Karim R, Evans JR, et al. Corneal collagen crosslinking for treating keratoconus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(3): CD010621. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010621.pub2

    23. Koller T, Mrochen M, Seiler T. Complication and failure rates after corneal crosslinking. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(8): 1358–1362. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.03.035