ILM removal in vitreomacular interface disorders: for or against?

    

    Abstract

    ILM removal in vitreomacular interface disorders: for or against?

    S.V. Kolesnik, A.I. Kolesnik, A.V. Miridonova, F.A. Avakyan, A.S. Zhuravlev

    Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution, Moscow, Russian Federation

    Purpose. To provide data on efficacy and safety of internal limiting membrane (ILM) removal in various pathologies of the vitreomacular interface.

    Material and methods. To perform the review, literature sources were searched through the PubMed and Scopus databases up to year 2021 using the keywords "internal limiting membrane peeling", "macular hole", "epiretinal membrane". A total of 38 articles relevant to the topic of the review were selected.

    Results. Numerous studies have confirmed the efficacy of internal limiting peeling in improving anatomical and functional outcomes of treatment of various pathologies. However, even a flawlessly performed peeling can cause both anatomical and functional effects on the retina. Various studies have demonstrated that the anatomical complications of ILM peeling did not correlate with the functional outcomes of surgery.

    Conclusion. Available evidence supports ILM peeling as an intervention that improves anatomical and functional results of treatment and reduces rate of reoperation. However, in order to evaluate the safety of this procedure, further studies with an assessment of the visual function with a long follow-up period are required.

    Key words: internal limiting membrane, peeling, macular hole, epiretinal membrane

    

    For quoting: Kolesnik S.V., Kolesnik A.I., Miridonova A.V., Avakyan F.A., Zhuravlev A.S. ILM removal in vitreomacular interface disorders: for or against? Fyodorov Journal of Ophthalmic Surgery. 2021;3: 83–88. https://doi.org/10.25276/0235-4160-2021-3-83-88

    

    For correspondence:

    Alexey Zhuravlev, postgraduate doctor

    ORCID ID: 0000-0002-6306-0428

    E-mail: zhuravlevalexey96@gmail.com