Репозиторий OAI—PMH
Репозиторий Российская Офтальмология Онлайн по протоколу OAI-PMH
Конференции
Офтальмологические конференции и симпозиумы
Видео
Видео докладов
23-я Всероссийская научно-практическая конференция с международным участием
Современные технологии лечения витреоретинальной патологии 2026
22-я Всероссийская научно-практическая конференция с международным участием
Современные технологии лечения витреоретинальной патологии 2025
23-я Всероссийская научно-практическая конференция с международным участием
Современные технологии лечения витреоретинальной патологии 2026
| Реферат RUS | Реферат ENG | Литература | Полный текст |
| УДК: | 311.11:617.7 https://doi.org/10.25276/0235-4160-2016-1-73-77 |
A.A. Shpak
Issues of the statistical analysis in the Russian ophthalmic journals
Adstract
Issues of the statistical analysis in the Russian ophthalmic journals
A.A. Shpak
The S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution, Moscow
Purpose. To rate the quality of the statistical analysis in the leading Russian journals in ophthalmology.
Material and methods. The study was performed of the quality of the statistical analysis and the formation of research groups in 90 original articles published in 2015 in leading
Russian ophthalmology journals. Twenty-three articles (case reports, surgical techniques, etc.) did not contain statistical data and were excluded. As a result, 67 articles were studied.
Results. Appropriate statistical analysis without serious mistakes was found in 14 publications (21%) but only five of them (7%) did not contain any shortcomings. The most common errors were: inclusion in the analysis of both eyes of patients without correction for the correlation of the parameters of the fellow eyes (30%), comparing of multiple groups by incorrect methods (28%; 82% of the articles requiring this comparison), comparing proportions without the use of proper methods (24%), absence (25%) or a clear deficiency (18%) of the statistical analysis section, lack of information on the format of the data used M±SD or M±m (16%), lack of guidance on the use or incorrect use of unpaired or paired Student’s t test (15%).
Concerning the formation of research groups the most common errors were: sample size calculation was not present (all articles), sampling order was not defined (82%), exclusion criteria were absent (64%).
Conclusion. The analysis of original articles in leading Russian ophthalmology journals in 2015 indicates the need for a significant increase in quality requirements for statistical data processing and the formation of research groups. Based on this analysis, it was proposed to amend the rules for authors in ophthalmology journals.
Key words: statistical analysis, the formation of research groups, multiple groups, paired eyes.
The author has no financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
Issues of the statistical analysis in the Russian ophthalmic journals
A.A. Shpak
The S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution, Moscow
Purpose. To rate the quality of the statistical analysis in the leading Russian journals in ophthalmology.
Material and methods. The study was performed of the quality of the statistical analysis and the formation of research groups in 90 original articles published in 2015 in leading
Russian ophthalmology journals. Twenty-three articles (case reports, surgical techniques, etc.) did not contain statistical data and were excluded. As a result, 67 articles were studied.
Results. Appropriate statistical analysis without serious mistakes was found in 14 publications (21%) but only five of them (7%) did not contain any shortcomings. The most common errors were: inclusion in the analysis of both eyes of patients without correction for the correlation of the parameters of the fellow eyes (30%), comparing of multiple groups by incorrect methods (28%; 82% of the articles requiring this comparison), comparing proportions without the use of proper methods (24%), absence (25%) or a clear deficiency (18%) of the statistical analysis section, lack of information on the format of the data used M±SD or M±m (16%), lack of guidance on the use or incorrect use of unpaired or paired Student’s t test (15%).
Concerning the formation of research groups the most common errors were: sample size calculation was not present (all articles), sampling order was not defined (82%), exclusion criteria were absent (64%).
Conclusion. The analysis of original articles in leading Russian ophthalmology journals in 2015 indicates the need for a significant increase in quality requirements for statistical data processing and the formation of research groups. Based on this analysis, it was proposed to amend the rules for authors in ophthalmology journals.
Key words: statistical analysis, the formation of research groups, multiple groups, paired eyes.
The author has no financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
Страница источника: 73-77
Каталог
Продукции
Организации
Офтальмологические клиники, производители и поставщики оборудования
Издания
Периодические издания
Партнеры
Проекта Российская Офтальмология Онлайн





















