Репозиторий OAI—PMH
Репозиторий Российская Офтальмология Онлайн по протоколу OAI-PMH
Конференции
Офтальмологические конференции и симпозиумы
Видео
Видео докладов
23-я Всероссийская научно-практическая конференция с международным участием
Современные технологии лечения витреоретинальной патологии 2026
22-я Всероссийская научно-практическая конференция с международным участием
Современные технологии лечения витреоретинальной патологии 2025
23-я Всероссийская научно-практическая конференция с международным участием
Современные технологии лечения витреоретинальной патологии 2026
Источник
Влияние параметров оптической системы миопического глаза на результаты измерений структур глазного дна методом оптической когерентной томографииСписок литературы
Литература
1. Акопян В.С., Семенова Н.С., Филоненко И.В., Цысарь М.А. Оценка комплекса ганглиозных клеток сетчатки при первичной открытоугольной глаукоме // Офтальмология. – 2011. – Т.8. – №1. – С.20-26.
2. Астахов Ю.С., Белехова С.Г. Оптическая когерентная томография: как все начиналось и современные диагностические возможности методики// Офтальмологические ведомости. – 2014. – Т.7. – №2. – C. 60–68.
3. Белогурова А.В. Дифференциально-диагностические критерии и мониторинг глаукомного процесса при осевой миопии: Автореф. дис. … канд. мед. наук. М., 2016. – 22 с.
4. Еричев В.П., Акопян А.И. Некоторые корреляционные взаимоотношения параметров ретинотомографического исследования// Глаукома. – 2016. – Т.14. – №2. – С.24-28.
5. Захарова М.А., Куроедов А.В. Оптическая когерентная томография: технология, ставшая реальностью// РМЖ. Клиническая офтальмология. – 2015. – Т.15. – №4. – С.204–211.
6. Куроедов А.В., Городничий В.В. Компьютерная ретинотомография (HRT): диагностика, динамика, достоверность. М., 2007. – 236 с.
7. Курышева Н.И. Оптическая когерентная томография в диагностике глаукомы – М., 2015. – 146с.
8. Тахчиди Х.П., Бессарабов А.Н., Пантелеев Е.Н. Параметризованный схематический стандартный глаз для решения вычислительных задач офтальмологии(I часть) // Офтальмохирургия. – 2006. – №4. – С.57–63.
9. Точность (правильность и прецизионность) методов и результатов измерений. Часть 1. Основные положения и определения: ГОСТ Р-ИСО 5725-1-2002. М.: Стандартинформ; – 2006.
10. Шпак А.А. Спектральная оптическая когерентная томография высокого разрешения: Атлас. – М., 2014. – 170с.
11. Шпак А.А. Новая номенклатура оптической когерентной томографии // Офтальмохирургия. – 2015. – №3. – С.80–82.
12. Шпак А.А., Копаева В.Г., Ю. В. Андреев Ю. В., Руднева М.А. Оптическая когерентная томография у больных с незрелой катарактой и артифакией// Вест. Офтальмологии. 2006. – №4. – С.18-20.
13. Шпак А.А., Огородникова С.Н. Диагностические возможности спектральной оптической когерентной томографии при центральной серозной хориоретинопатии // Вестник офтальмологии. – 2009. – №4. – с. 15-17.
14. Шпак А.А., Огородникова С.Н. Ошибки классической и спектральной оптической когерентной томографии при измерении слоя нервных волокон сетчатки у здоровых лиц // Вестник Офтальмологии. – 2010. – №5. – С.19-21.
15. Шпак А.А., Севостьянова М.К. Оценка диска зрительного нерва методами спектральной оптической когерентной томографии и гейдельбергской ретинотомографии в диагностике первичной открытоугольной начальной глаукомы// Офтальмохирургия. – 2014. – № 1. – С.60-63.
16. Шпак А.А., Севостьянова М.К., Огородникова С.Н. Оценка макулярного слоя ганглиозных клеток методом спектральной оптической когерентной томографии в диагностике начальной глаукомы // Вестник офтальмологии. – 2013. – №6. – С. 16-18.
17. Щуко А.Г., Малышева В.В. Оптическая когерентная томография в диагностике глазных болезней – М.:ГЭОТАР-Медиа 2010. – 128с.
18. Экгардт В.Ф., Дорофеев Д.А., Шаимов Т.Б., Деев Р.В. О размерах диска зрительного нерва// Казанский мед. ж. – 2013. – Т.94. – №6. – С.850-853.
19. Эскина Э.Н., Казакова А.В. Диагностика глаукомы у пациентов с близорукостью // Национальный журнал Глаукома. – 2015. – Т.14. – №3. – С.87-100.
20. Эскина Э.Н., Зыкова А.В. Ранние критерии риска развития глаукомы у пациентов с близорукостью// Офтальмология. – 2014. – Т. 11. – №2. – С. 59- 63.
21. Эфендиева М.Э. Сравнительная оценка толщины слоя нервных волокон сетчатки у пациентов с миопией разной степени // Вестник Офтальмологии. – 2014. – №4. – С.8-21.
22. Akashi A., Kanamori A., Ueda K. et al. The Ability of SD-OCT to differentiate early glaucoma with high myopia from highly myopic controls and nonhighly myopic controls // Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. – 2015. – Vol.56. – № 11. – P.6573-6580.
23. Aristeidou A., Labiris G., Paschalis E. Evaluation of the retinal nerve fiber layer measurements, after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis, using scanning laser polarimetry (GDX VCC) // Graefes. Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. – 2010. – Vol.248. – №5. – P.731-736.
24. Arvind H., George R., Raju P. et al. Optic disc dimensions and cup-disc ratios among healthy South Indians: The Chennai Glaucoma Study // Ophthalmic Epidemiol. – 2011. – Vol.18. – №5.- P.189-197.
25. Atchison D., Smith G. Optics of the human eye. Oxford: ButterworthHeinemann, 2000. – p.64.
26. Atchison D.A., Jones C.E., Schmid K.L. et al. Eye shape in emmetropia and myopia // Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.- 2004.- Vol. 45, №10.- P.3380-3386.
27. Badala′ F., Nouri-Mahdavi K., Raoof D.A. et al. Optic disk and nerve fiber layer imaging to detect glaucoma // Am. J. Ophthalmol. – 2007. Vol.144. –№5. – P.724-732.
28. Bae S., Kang S., Feng C. et al. Influence of myopia on size of optic nerve head and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by spectral domain optical coherence tomography // Korean J. Ophtalmol. – 2016. – Vol. 30. – №5. – P.335-343.
29. Bambo M., Garcia-Martin E., Otin S. et al. Influence of cataract surgery on repeatability and measurements of spectral domain optical coherence tomography // Br. J. Ophthalmol. – 2014. – Vol.98. – №1. – P.52-58.
30. Bengtsson B., Krakau C. Some essential optical features of the Zeiss fundus camera. Acta Ophthalmol (Kbh). – 1977. – Vol. 55. – P.123–131.
31. Bengtsson B., Krakau C. Correction of optic disc measurements on fundus photographs // Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. – 1992. – Vol.230. – P.24–28.
32. Bennett A., Rudnicka A., Edgar D. Improvements on Littmann's method of determining the size of retinal features by fundus photography // Graefes. Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. – 1994. – Vol.232. – №6. – P.361-367
33. Cankaya A., Simsek T. Topographic differences between large and normal optic discs: a confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy study // Eur. J. Ophthalmol. – 2012. – Vol.22. – №1. – P.63-69.
34. Celik E., Cakir B., Turkoglu E. et al. Effect of cataract surgery on subfoveal choroidal and ganglion cell complex thicknesses measured by enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography // Clin. Ophthalmol. – 2016. – Vol.10. – №1. – P.2171-2177.
35. Cheng C., Natividad M., Earnest A. et al. Comparison of the influence of cataract and pupil size on retinal nerve fibre layer thickness measurements with time-domain and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography // Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. – 2011. – Vol.39. – №3. – P.215-221.
36. Cirrus HD-OCT User Manual – Models 500, 5000. Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., 2015.
37. Crowston J., Hopley C., Healey P. et al. The effect of optic disc diameter on vertical cup to disc ratio percentiles in a population based cohort: the Blue Mountains Eye Study // Br. J. Ophthalmol. – 2004. – Vol.88. – №6. – P.766-770.
38. Cunningham C., Critser D., Han I. Swept-Source OCT of a Scleral Tunnel in Choroideremia. Ophthalmology. – 2018. – Vol.125. – №6:806.
39. Dada T., Behera G., Agarwal A. et al. Effect of cataract surgery on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness parameters using scanning laser polarimetry (GDxVCC) // Indian. J. Ophthalmol. – 2010. – Vol.58. – №5. – P:389-394.
40. Diaz J., Wang J., Oellers P et al. Imaging the deep choroidal vasculature using spectral domain and swept source optical coherence tomography angiography // J. Vitreoretin. Dis. – 2018. – Vol.2. – №3. – P.146-154.
41. Eysteinsson T., Jonasson F., Arnarsson A. et al. Relationships between ocular dimensions and adult stature among participants in the Reykjavik Eye Study // Acta Ophthalmol. Scand. – 2005. – Vol.83. – №6. – P.734-738.
42. Fingeret M., Flanagan J.G., Liebmann J.M. (editors), The Essential HRT Primer. San Ramon, Ca: Jocoto Advertising Inc., 2005.- 127 p.
43. Foster P., Broadway D., Hayat S. et al. Refractive error, axial length and anterior chamber depth of the eye in British adults: the EPIC-Norfolk Eye Study // Br. J. Ophthalmol. – 2010. – Vol.94. – №7. – P.827-830.
44. Fotedar R., Wang J., Burlutsky G. et al. Distribution of axial length and ocular biometry measured using partial coherence laser interferometry (IOL Master) in an older white population // Ophthalmology. – 2010. – Vol.117. – №3. – P.417-423.
45. Ganekal S. Ganglion cell complex scan in the early prediction of glaucoma // Nepal J Ophthalmol. – 2012. – Vol. 4. – №2. – Р. 236-241.
46. Garcia-Bella J., Talavero-González P., Carballo-álvarez J. et al. Changes in retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements in response to a trifocal intraocular lens implantation // Eye (Lond). – 2018. – Vol. 32. – №10. – P.1574-1578.
47. Garway-Heath D., Rudnicka A., Lowe T. et al. Measurement of optic disc size: equivalence of methods to correct for ocular magnification // Br. J. Ophthalmol. – 1998. – Vol.82. – №6. – P.643-649.
48. Giansanti F., Bitossi A., Giacomelli G. et al. Evaluation of macular thickness after uncomplicated cataract surgery using optical coherence tomography // Eur. J. Ophthalmol. – 2013. – Vol. 23. – №5. – P.751-756.
49. Halkiadakis I., Anglionto L., Ferensowicz M. et al. Assessment of nerve fiber layer thickness before and after laser in situ keratomileusis using scanning laser polarimetry with variable corneal compensation // J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. – 2005. – Vol.31. – №5. – P.1035-1041.
50. Hee M., Izatt J., Swanson E. et al. Optical coherence tomography of the human retina // Arch. Ophthalmol. – 1995. – Vol.113. – №3. P.325-332.
51. Hee M., Puliafito C., Wong C. et al. Quantitative assessment of macular edema with optical coherence tomography // Arch. Ophthalmol. – 1995. – Vol.113. – №8. – P1019-1029.
52. Higashide T., Ohkubo S., Hangai M. et al. Influence of clinical factors and magnification correction on normal thickness profiles of macular retinal layers using optical coherence tomography // PLoS One. – 2016. – Vol.11. – №1. – e0147782.
53. Hirasawa K., Shoji N., Yoshii Y., Haraguchi S. Determination of axial length requiring adjustment of measured circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness for ocular magnification // PLoS One. – 2014. – Vol.12. – №9. – e107553.
54. Hlavácová P., Horácková M., Goutaib M. GDx pred a po LASIK u strednej a vyssej myopie. [GDx before and after LASIK in middle and high myopia] // Cesk. Slov. Oftalmol. – 2008. – Vol. 64. – №2. – P.71-76.
55. Ho J., Sull A., Vuong L. et al. Assessment of artifacts and reproducibility across spectral- and time-domain optical coherence tomography devices // Ophthalmology. – 2009. – Vol.116 – №10. – P.1960-1970.
56. Hoffmann E., Dick H., Grus F., Pfeiffer N. Laser-in-situ-Keratomileusis (LASIK) und Scanning-Laser-Ophthalmoskopie // Ophthalmologe. – 2005. – Vol. 102. – №9. – P.856-862.
57. Hoffmann E.M., Zangwill L.M., Crowston J.G., Weinreb R.N. Optic disk size and glaucoma // Surv. Ophthalmol. – 2007. – Vol.52 – №1. – P.32-49.
58. Hong S.W., Ahn M.D., Kang S.H., Im S.K. Analysis of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber distribution in normal young adults // Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. – 2010. –Vol.51. – №7. – P.3515-3523.
59. Hosny M., Zaki R., Ahmed R. et al. Changes in retinal nerve fiber layer thickness following mechanical microkeratome-assisted versus femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK // Clin. Ophthalmol. – 2013. – Vol.7. P.1919-1922.
60. Hsu S., Chang M., Ko M., Harnod T. Retinal nerve fibre layer thickness and optic nerve head size measured in high myopes by optical coherence tomography // Clin. Exp. Optom. – 2013. – Vol.96. – №4. – P.373-378.
61. Huang D., Chopra V., Lu A.T. et al. Advanced Imaging for Glaucoma StudyAIGS Group. Does optic nerve head size variation affect circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurement by optical coherence tomography? // Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis Sci. – 2012. – Vol.5. –№8. – P.4990-4997.
62. Huang D., Swanson E., Lin P. et al. Optical coherence tomography // Science. – 1991. – Vol.254. – №5035. – P.1178-1181.
63. Hwang Y.H., Kim Y.Y. Correlation between optic nerve head parameters and retinal nerve fibre layer thickness measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in myopic eyes // Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. – 2012. – Vol.40. – №7. – P.713-720.
64. Jha B., Sharma R., Vanathi M. et al. Effect of phacoemulsification on measurement of retinal nerve fiber layer and optic nerve head parameters using spectral-domain-optical coherence tomography // J Ophthalmol. – 2017. – Vol.10. – №2. – P.91-95.
65. Jivrajka R., Shammas M.C., Boenzi T. et al. Variability of axial length, anterior chamber depth, and lens thickness in the cataractous eye // J. Cataract Refract. Surg. – 2008. – Vol.34. – №2. – P.289-294.
66. Kang S., Hong S., Im S. et al. Effect of myopia on the thickness of the retinal nerve fiber layer measured by Cirrus HD optical coherence tomography // Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. – 2010. – Vol.51. – №8. – P.4075-4083.
67. Kim Y., Kang M., Cho H., Lim H., Seong M. Comparative study of macular ganglion cell complex thickness measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in healthy eyes, eyes with preperimetric glaucoma, and eyes with early glaucoma // Jpn. J. Ophthalmol. – 2014. – Vol. 58. – №3. – Р. 244- 251.
68. Koh L., Ismail M., Yap S. et al. Effect of head tilt on repeatability of optic nerve head parameters using Cirrus spectral-domain optical coherence tomography // Int. J. Ophthalmol. – 2016. – Vol.9. – №8. – P.1170-1175.
69. Koh V., Tham Y., Cheung C. et al. Determinants of ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness measured by high-definition optical coherence tomography // Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. – 2012. – Vol.53. – №9. – P.5853-5859.
70. Kok P., van den Berg T., van Dijk H. et al. The relationship between the optical density of cataract and its influence on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured with spectral domain optical coherence tomography // Acta Ophthalmol. – 2013. – Vol.91. – №5. – P:418-424.
71. Kuang T., Liu C., Ko Y. et al. Distribution and associated factors of optic disc diameter and cup-to-disc ratio in an elderly Chinese population // J. Chin. Med. Assoc. – 2014. – Vol.77. – №4. – P.203-208.
72. Langenegger S., Funk J., Toteberg-Harms M. Reproducibility of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements using the eye tracker and the retest function of Spectralis SD-OCT in glaucomatous and healthy control eyes // Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. – 2011. – Vol. 52. – №6. – P.3338-3344.
73. Lee J., Kim N., Kim H. et al. Negative refraction power causes underestimation of peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness in spectraldomain optical coherence tomography // Br. J. Ophthalmol. – 2011. – Vol.95. – № 9. – P.1284-1289.
74. Lee W., Kim Y., Park K., Jeoung J. Trend-based analysis of ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness changes on optical coherence tomography in glaucoma progression // Ophthalmology. – 2017. – Vol.124. – №9. – Р.1383-1391.
75. Leung C., Cheng A., Chong K. et al. Optic disc measurements in myopia with optical coherence tomography and confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy // Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. – 2007. – Vol.48. – №7. –P.3178-3183.
76. Littmann H. Zur Bestimmung der wahren Grosse eines Objektes auf dem Hintergrund des lebenden Auges // Klin. Monatsbl. Augenheilkd. – 1982. – Bd.180. – №4. – S.286-289.
77. Lumbroso B., Rispoli M. Practical retinal OCT. 1st. edition. P.:Jaypee brothers medical pub,2014. – 110 p.
78. Malakar M., Askari S., Ashraf H. Optical coherence tomography assisted retinal nerve fibre layer thickness profile in high myopia // J. Clin. Diagn. Res. – Vol. 9. – №2. – P.NC01–NC03.
79. Mauschitz M., Roth F., Holz F. et al. The impact of lens opacity on SD-OCT retinal nerve fiber layer and Bruch's membrane opening measurements using the anatomical positioning system (APS) // Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. – 2017. – Vol.58. – №5. – P.2804-2809.
80. Medeiros F., Zangwill L., Bowd C. et al. Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer, optic nerve head, and macular thickness measurements for glaucoma detection using optical coherence tomography // Am. J. Ophthalmol. – 2005. – Vol.139. – №1. – P.44-55.
81. Mwanza J., Bhorade A., Sekhon N. et al. Effect of cataract and its removal on signal strength and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer optical coherence tomography measurements // J. Glaucoma. – 2011. – Vol.20. – №1. – P.37-43.
82. Mwanza J., Chang R., Budenz D. et al. Reproducibility of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and optic nerve head parameters measured with Cirrus HD-OCT in glaucomatous eyes // Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. – 2010. – Vol.51. – №11. – P.5724–5730.
83. Mwanza J., Durbin M., Budenz D. et al. Glaucoma diagnostic accuracy of ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness: comparison with nerve fiber layer and optic nerve head // Ophthalmology. – 2012. – Vol.119. – №6. – P.1151-1158.
84. Mwanza J., Sayyad F., Aref A., Budenz D. Rates of abnormal retinal nerve fiber layer and ganglion cell layer OCT scans in healthy myopic eyes: Cirrus versus RTVue // Ophthalmic Surg. Lasers Imaging. – 2012. – Vol.43. – №6. – P.67-74.
85. Nakatani Y., Higashide T., Ohkubo S. et al.Effect of cataract and its removal on ganglion cell complex thickness and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements by fourier-domain optical coherence tomography // J. Glaucoma. – 2013. – Vol.22. – №6. – P.447-455
86. Nakayama L., Bergamo V., Silva L., Moraes N. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) angiography of central retinal artery occlusion in the patent cilioretinal artery: a case report // Arq. Bras. Oftalmol. – 2018. – Vol.81. – №3. – P.242-246.
87. Namavari A., Zheng F., Motulsky E. et al. Swept-Source OCT Angiography Identifies Choroidal Neovascularization Arising From a Choroidal Nevus // Ophthalmic. Surg. Lasers Imaging Retina. – 2018. – Vol.49. – №5. – P.360-363.
88. Nidek Co., Ltd. Software for RS series Long Axial Length Normative Database. http://www.nidekintl.com/product/ophthaloptom/diagnostic/dia_retina/longaxiallength.html.
89. Oner V., Aykut V., Tas M. et al. Effect of refractive status on peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness: a study by RTVue spectral domain optical coherence tomography // Br. J. Ophthalmol. – 2013. – Vol.97. – №1. – P.75-79.
90. Patel N., Garcia B., Harwerth R. Influence of anterior segment power on the scan path and RNFL thickness using SD-OCT // Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. – 2012. – Vol.53. – №9. – P.5788-5798.
91. Pierro L., Gagliardi M., Iuliano L. et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness reproducibility using seven different OCT instruments // Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. –2012. – Vol.53. – №9. – P.5912-5920.
92. Puliafito C., Hee M., Lin C. et al. Imaging of macular diseases with optical coherence tomography // Ophthalmology. – 1995. – Vol.102. – №2. – P.217-229.
93. Rolle T., Dallorto L., Tavassoli M., Nuzzi R. Diagnostic ability and discriminant values of OCT-angiography parameters in early glaucoma diagnosis // Ophthalmic. Res. – 2018. – Vol.28. – P.1-10.
94. Salchow D., Hwang A., Li F., Dziura J. Effect of contact lens power on optical coherence tomography of the retinal nerve fiber layer // Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. – 2011. – Vol.5. – №3. – P.1650-1654.
95. Savini G., Barboni P., Parisi V., Carbonelli M. The influence of axial length on retinal nerve fibre layer thickness and optic-disc size measurements by spectral-domain OCT // Br. J. Ophthalmol. – 2012. – Vol.96. – №1. – P.57-61.
96. Savini G., Bellusci C., Carbonelli M. et al. Detection and quantification of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in optic disc edema using stratus OCT // Arch. Ophthalmol. – 2006. – Vol.124. – №8. – P.1111-1117.
97. Schulze A., Lamparter J., Pfeiffer N. et al. Diagnostic ability of retinal ganglion cell complex, retinal nerve fiber layer, and optic nerve head measurements by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography // Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. – 2011. – Vol.249. – №7. – P.1039-1045.
98. Schuman J., Hee M., Puliafito C. et al. Quantification of nerve fiber layer thickness in normal and glaucomatous eyes using optical coherence tomography // Arch. Ophthalmol. – 1995. – Vol.113. – № 5. – P.586-596.
99. Schuman J., Puliafito C., Fujimoto J. // Optical coherence tomography of ocular disease // Thorofare, USA. –Slack Inc. – 2004. – 714 p.
100. Seo S., Lee C.E., Jeong J.H. et al. Ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness according to myopia and optic disc area: a quantitative and three-dimensional analysis // BMC Ophthalmol. – 2017. – Vol.17:22
101. Sezgin Akcay B.I., Gunay B.O., Kardes E. et al. Evaluation of the ganglion cell complex and retinal nerve fiber layer in low, moderate, and high myopia: a study by RTVue spectral domain optical coherence tomography // Semin. Ophthalmol. – 2017. – Vol. 32. – №6. – P.682-688.
102. Sharma N., Sony P., Gupta A., Vajpayee R. Effect of laser in situ keratomileusis and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness // J. Cataract Refract. Surg. – 2006. – Vol. 32. – №3. – P.446-450.
103. Shpak A., Sevostyanova M., Ogorodnikova S., Shormaz I. Comparison of measurement error of Cirrus HD-OCT and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 in patients with early glaucomatous visual field defect // Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. – 2012. – Vol.250. – №2. – P.271-277.
104. Shufelt C., Fraser-Bell S., Ying-Lai M. et al. Refractive error, ocular biometry, and lens opalescence in an adult population: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study // Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. – 2005. – Vol.46. – №12. – P.4450-4460.
105. Snirivasan V., Wojtkowski M., Witkin A. et al. High definition and 3-dimensional imaging of macular pathologies with high-speed ultrahighresolution optical coherence tomography // Ophthalmology. – 2006. – Vol.113. – №11. – P.2054-2065.
106. Spaide R., Ohno-Matsui K., Yannuzzi L. (eds.) Pathologic Myopia. New York etc.: Springer, 2014.- 376 p.
107. Staurenghi G., Sadda S., Chakravarthy U., Spaide R.F. International Nomenclature for Optical Coherence Tomography (IN•OCT) Panel. Proposed lexicon for anatomic landmarks in normal posterior segment spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: the IN•OCT consensus // Ophthalmology. – 2014. – Vol. 121. – №8. – P. 1572-1578.
108. Swanson E., Izatt J., Hee M. et al. In vivo retinal imaging by optical coherence tomography // Opt Lett. – 1993. Vol.18. – №21. – P.1864-1866.
109. Takayama K., Hangai M., Durbin M. et al. A novel method to detect local ganglion cell loss in early glaucoma using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography // Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. – 2012. – Vol. 53. – No11. – Р. 6904-6913.
110. Takeyama A., Kita Y., Kita R., Tomita G. Influence of axial length on ganglion cell complex (GCC) thickness and on GCC thickness to retinal thickness ratios in young adults // Jpn. J. Ophthalmol. – 2014. – Vol.58. – №1. – P.86-93.
111. Tan O., Chopra V., Lu A.T. et al. Detection of macular ganglion cell loss in glaucoma by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography // Ophthalmology. – 2009. – Vol.116. – №12. – P.2305-2314.
112. Tas M., Oner V., Turkcu F.M. et al. Peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in hyperopic children // Optom. Vis. Sci. – 2012. – Vol.89. – №7. – P.1009-1013.
113. Topcon 3D OCT Series Normative Database. Topcon Medical Systems, Inc., 2011.- 8 p.
114. Tsai D.C., Huang N., Hwu J.J. et al. Estimating retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in normal schoolchildren with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography // Jpn. J. Ophthalmol. – 2012. – Vol.56. – №4. – P.362-370.
115. Ueda K., Kanamori A., Akashi A. et al. Effects of axial length and age on circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer and inner macular parameters measured by 3 types of SD-OCT instruments // J Glaucoma. – 2016. – Vol.25. – №4. – P. 383-389.
116. Wang Y., Du J., Yang M. et al. Distinct macular thickness changes after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery of age-related cataract and myopia with cataract // Sci. Rep. – 2018. – Vol.8. – №1:3279.
117. Williams K.M., Verhoeven V.J., Cumberland P. et al. Prevalence of refractive error in Europe: the European Eye Epidemiology (E³ ) Consortium // Eur. J. Epidemiol.- 2015.- Vol.30, № 4.- P.305-315.
118. Wojtkowski M., Leitgeb R., Kowalczyk A. et al. In vivo human retinal imaging by Fourier domain optical coherence tomography // J.Biomed.Opt. – 2002. – Vol.7. – №3. – P.457-463.
119. Yang Z., Tatham A., Weinreb R. et al. Diagnostic ability of macular ganglion cell inner plexiform layer measurements in glaucoma using swept source and spectral domain optical coherence tomography // PLoS One. – 2015. – Vol. 10. – №5. – e0125957.
120. Yang B., Ye C., Yu M. et al. Optic disc imaging with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: variability and agreement study with Heidelberg retinal tomograph // Ophthalmology. – 2012. – Vol. 119. – №9. – P.1852-1857.
121. Yanoff M., Duker J.S. Ophthalmology. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier, 2014. – p.337.
122.Yilmaz T., Karci A., Yilmaz I. et al. Long-Term Changes in Subfoveal Choroidal Thickness After Cataract Surgery // Med. Sci.Monit. – 2016. – Vol.22. – P.1566-1570.
123. Yoo Y.C., Lee C.M., Park J.H. Changes in peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer distribution by axial length // Optom. Vis. Sci. – 2012. – Vol.89. – №1. – P.4-11.
124. Yoshikawa Y., Shoji T., Kanno J. et al. Optic disc vessel density in nonglaucomatous and glaucomatous eyes: an enhanced-depth imaging optical coherence tomography angiography study // Clin. Ophthalmol. – 2018. – Vol.12. – P.1113-1119.
125. Zangwill L., Abunto T., Bowd C. et al. Scanning laser polarimetry retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements after LASIK // Ophthalmology. – 2005. – Vol.112. – №2. – P.200-207.
126. Zhang J., Zhou Y. Effect of suction on macular thickness and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness during LASIK used femtosecond laser and Moria M2 microkeratome // Int. J. Ophthalmol. – 2015. – Vol.8. – №4. – P.777-783.
2. Астахов Ю.С., Белехова С.Г. Оптическая когерентная томография: как все начиналось и современные диагностические возможности методики// Офтальмологические ведомости. – 2014. – Т.7. – №2. – C. 60–68.
3. Белогурова А.В. Дифференциально-диагностические критерии и мониторинг глаукомного процесса при осевой миопии: Автореф. дис. … канд. мед. наук. М., 2016. – 22 с.
4. Еричев В.П., Акопян А.И. Некоторые корреляционные взаимоотношения параметров ретинотомографического исследования// Глаукома. – 2016. – Т.14. – №2. – С.24-28.
5. Захарова М.А., Куроедов А.В. Оптическая когерентная томография: технология, ставшая реальностью// РМЖ. Клиническая офтальмология. – 2015. – Т.15. – №4. – С.204–211.
6. Куроедов А.В., Городничий В.В. Компьютерная ретинотомография (HRT): диагностика, динамика, достоверность. М., 2007. – 236 с.
7. Курышева Н.И. Оптическая когерентная томография в диагностике глаукомы – М., 2015. – 146с.
8. Тахчиди Х.П., Бессарабов А.Н., Пантелеев Е.Н. Параметризованный схематический стандартный глаз для решения вычислительных задач офтальмологии(I часть) // Офтальмохирургия. – 2006. – №4. – С.57–63.
9. Точность (правильность и прецизионность) методов и результатов измерений. Часть 1. Основные положения и определения: ГОСТ Р-ИСО 5725-1-2002. М.: Стандартинформ; – 2006.
10. Шпак А.А. Спектральная оптическая когерентная томография высокого разрешения: Атлас. – М., 2014. – 170с.
11. Шпак А.А. Новая номенклатура оптической когерентной томографии // Офтальмохирургия. – 2015. – №3. – С.80–82.
12. Шпак А.А., Копаева В.Г., Ю. В. Андреев Ю. В., Руднева М.А. Оптическая когерентная томография у больных с незрелой катарактой и артифакией// Вест. Офтальмологии. 2006. – №4. – С.18-20.
13. Шпак А.А., Огородникова С.Н. Диагностические возможности спектральной оптической когерентной томографии при центральной серозной хориоретинопатии // Вестник офтальмологии. – 2009. – №4. – с. 15-17.
14. Шпак А.А., Огородникова С.Н. Ошибки классической и спектральной оптической когерентной томографии при измерении слоя нервных волокон сетчатки у здоровых лиц // Вестник Офтальмологии. – 2010. – №5. – С.19-21.
15. Шпак А.А., Севостьянова М.К. Оценка диска зрительного нерва методами спектральной оптической когерентной томографии и гейдельбергской ретинотомографии в диагностике первичной открытоугольной начальной глаукомы// Офтальмохирургия. – 2014. – № 1. – С.60-63.
16. Шпак А.А., Севостьянова М.К., Огородникова С.Н. Оценка макулярного слоя ганглиозных клеток методом спектральной оптической когерентной томографии в диагностике начальной глаукомы // Вестник офтальмологии. – 2013. – №6. – С. 16-18.
17. Щуко А.Г., Малышева В.В. Оптическая когерентная томография в диагностике глазных болезней – М.:ГЭОТАР-Медиа 2010. – 128с.
18. Экгардт В.Ф., Дорофеев Д.А., Шаимов Т.Б., Деев Р.В. О размерах диска зрительного нерва// Казанский мед. ж. – 2013. – Т.94. – №6. – С.850-853.
19. Эскина Э.Н., Казакова А.В. Диагностика глаукомы у пациентов с близорукостью // Национальный журнал Глаукома. – 2015. – Т.14. – №3. – С.87-100.
20. Эскина Э.Н., Зыкова А.В. Ранние критерии риска развития глаукомы у пациентов с близорукостью// Офтальмология. – 2014. – Т. 11. – №2. – С. 59- 63.
21. Эфендиева М.Э. Сравнительная оценка толщины слоя нервных волокон сетчатки у пациентов с миопией разной степени // Вестник Офтальмологии. – 2014. – №4. – С.8-21.
22. Akashi A., Kanamori A., Ueda K. et al. The Ability of SD-OCT to differentiate early glaucoma with high myopia from highly myopic controls and nonhighly myopic controls // Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. – 2015. – Vol.56. – № 11. – P.6573-6580.
23. Aristeidou A., Labiris G., Paschalis E. Evaluation of the retinal nerve fiber layer measurements, after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis, using scanning laser polarimetry (GDX VCC) // Graefes. Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. – 2010. – Vol.248. – №5. – P.731-736.
24. Arvind H., George R., Raju P. et al. Optic disc dimensions and cup-disc ratios among healthy South Indians: The Chennai Glaucoma Study // Ophthalmic Epidemiol. – 2011. – Vol.18. – №5.- P.189-197.
25. Atchison D., Smith G. Optics of the human eye. Oxford: ButterworthHeinemann, 2000. – p.64.
26. Atchison D.A., Jones C.E., Schmid K.L. et al. Eye shape in emmetropia and myopia // Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.- 2004.- Vol. 45, №10.- P.3380-3386.
27. Badala′ F., Nouri-Mahdavi K., Raoof D.A. et al. Optic disk and nerve fiber layer imaging to detect glaucoma // Am. J. Ophthalmol. – 2007. Vol.144. –№5. – P.724-732.
28. Bae S., Kang S., Feng C. et al. Influence of myopia on size of optic nerve head and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by spectral domain optical coherence tomography // Korean J. Ophtalmol. – 2016. – Vol. 30. – №5. – P.335-343.
29. Bambo M., Garcia-Martin E., Otin S. et al. Influence of cataract surgery on repeatability and measurements of spectral domain optical coherence tomography // Br. J. Ophthalmol. – 2014. – Vol.98. – №1. – P.52-58.
30. Bengtsson B., Krakau C. Some essential optical features of the Zeiss fundus camera. Acta Ophthalmol (Kbh). – 1977. – Vol. 55. – P.123–131.
31. Bengtsson B., Krakau C. Correction of optic disc measurements on fundus photographs // Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. – 1992. – Vol.230. – P.24–28.
32. Bennett A., Rudnicka A., Edgar D. Improvements on Littmann's method of determining the size of retinal features by fundus photography // Graefes. Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. – 1994. – Vol.232. – №6. – P.361-367
33. Cankaya A., Simsek T. Topographic differences between large and normal optic discs: a confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy study // Eur. J. Ophthalmol. – 2012. – Vol.22. – №1. – P.63-69.
34. Celik E., Cakir B., Turkoglu E. et al. Effect of cataract surgery on subfoveal choroidal and ganglion cell complex thicknesses measured by enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography // Clin. Ophthalmol. – 2016. – Vol.10. – №1. – P.2171-2177.
35. Cheng C., Natividad M., Earnest A. et al. Comparison of the influence of cataract and pupil size on retinal nerve fibre layer thickness measurements with time-domain and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography // Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. – 2011. – Vol.39. – №3. – P.215-221.
36. Cirrus HD-OCT User Manual – Models 500, 5000. Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., 2015.
37. Crowston J., Hopley C., Healey P. et al. The effect of optic disc diameter on vertical cup to disc ratio percentiles in a population based cohort: the Blue Mountains Eye Study // Br. J. Ophthalmol. – 2004. – Vol.88. – №6. – P.766-770.
38. Cunningham C., Critser D., Han I. Swept-Source OCT of a Scleral Tunnel in Choroideremia. Ophthalmology. – 2018. – Vol.125. – №6:806.
39. Dada T., Behera G., Agarwal A. et al. Effect of cataract surgery on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness parameters using scanning laser polarimetry (GDxVCC) // Indian. J. Ophthalmol. – 2010. – Vol.58. – №5. – P:389-394.
40. Diaz J., Wang J., Oellers P et al. Imaging the deep choroidal vasculature using spectral domain and swept source optical coherence tomography angiography // J. Vitreoretin. Dis. – 2018. – Vol.2. – №3. – P.146-154.
41. Eysteinsson T., Jonasson F., Arnarsson A. et al. Relationships between ocular dimensions and adult stature among participants in the Reykjavik Eye Study // Acta Ophthalmol. Scand. – 2005. – Vol.83. – №6. – P.734-738.
42. Fingeret M., Flanagan J.G., Liebmann J.M. (editors), The Essential HRT Primer. San Ramon, Ca: Jocoto Advertising Inc., 2005.- 127 p.
43. Foster P., Broadway D., Hayat S. et al. Refractive error, axial length and anterior chamber depth of the eye in British adults: the EPIC-Norfolk Eye Study // Br. J. Ophthalmol. – 2010. – Vol.94. – №7. – P.827-830.
44. Fotedar R., Wang J., Burlutsky G. et al. Distribution of axial length and ocular biometry measured using partial coherence laser interferometry (IOL Master) in an older white population // Ophthalmology. – 2010. – Vol.117. – №3. – P.417-423.
45. Ganekal S. Ganglion cell complex scan in the early prediction of glaucoma // Nepal J Ophthalmol. – 2012. – Vol. 4. – №2. – Р. 236-241.
46. Garcia-Bella J., Talavero-González P., Carballo-álvarez J. et al. Changes in retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements in response to a trifocal intraocular lens implantation // Eye (Lond). – 2018. – Vol. 32. – №10. – P.1574-1578.
47. Garway-Heath D., Rudnicka A., Lowe T. et al. Measurement of optic disc size: equivalence of methods to correct for ocular magnification // Br. J. Ophthalmol. – 1998. – Vol.82. – №6. – P.643-649.
48. Giansanti F., Bitossi A., Giacomelli G. et al. Evaluation of macular thickness after uncomplicated cataract surgery using optical coherence tomography // Eur. J. Ophthalmol. – 2013. – Vol. 23. – №5. – P.751-756.
49. Halkiadakis I., Anglionto L., Ferensowicz M. et al. Assessment of nerve fiber layer thickness before and after laser in situ keratomileusis using scanning laser polarimetry with variable corneal compensation // J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. – 2005. – Vol.31. – №5. – P.1035-1041.
50. Hee M., Izatt J., Swanson E. et al. Optical coherence tomography of the human retina // Arch. Ophthalmol. – 1995. – Vol.113. – №3. P.325-332.
51. Hee M., Puliafito C., Wong C. et al. Quantitative assessment of macular edema with optical coherence tomography // Arch. Ophthalmol. – 1995. – Vol.113. – №8. – P1019-1029.
52. Higashide T., Ohkubo S., Hangai M. et al. Influence of clinical factors and magnification correction on normal thickness profiles of macular retinal layers using optical coherence tomography // PLoS One. – 2016. – Vol.11. – №1. – e0147782.
53. Hirasawa K., Shoji N., Yoshii Y., Haraguchi S. Determination of axial length requiring adjustment of measured circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness for ocular magnification // PLoS One. – 2014. – Vol.12. – №9. – e107553.
54. Hlavácová P., Horácková M., Goutaib M. GDx pred a po LASIK u strednej a vyssej myopie. [GDx before and after LASIK in middle and high myopia] // Cesk. Slov. Oftalmol. – 2008. – Vol. 64. – №2. – P.71-76.
55. Ho J., Sull A., Vuong L. et al. Assessment of artifacts and reproducibility across spectral- and time-domain optical coherence tomography devices // Ophthalmology. – 2009. – Vol.116 – №10. – P.1960-1970.
56. Hoffmann E., Dick H., Grus F., Pfeiffer N. Laser-in-situ-Keratomileusis (LASIK) und Scanning-Laser-Ophthalmoskopie // Ophthalmologe. – 2005. – Vol. 102. – №9. – P.856-862.
57. Hoffmann E.M., Zangwill L.M., Crowston J.G., Weinreb R.N. Optic disk size and glaucoma // Surv. Ophthalmol. – 2007. – Vol.52 – №1. – P.32-49.
58. Hong S.W., Ahn M.D., Kang S.H., Im S.K. Analysis of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber distribution in normal young adults // Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. – 2010. –Vol.51. – №7. – P.3515-3523.
59. Hosny M., Zaki R., Ahmed R. et al. Changes in retinal nerve fiber layer thickness following mechanical microkeratome-assisted versus femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK // Clin. Ophthalmol. – 2013. – Vol.7. P.1919-1922.
60. Hsu S., Chang M., Ko M., Harnod T. Retinal nerve fibre layer thickness and optic nerve head size measured in high myopes by optical coherence tomography // Clin. Exp. Optom. – 2013. – Vol.96. – №4. – P.373-378.
61. Huang D., Chopra V., Lu A.T. et al. Advanced Imaging for Glaucoma StudyAIGS Group. Does optic nerve head size variation affect circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurement by optical coherence tomography? // Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis Sci. – 2012. – Vol.5. –№8. – P.4990-4997.
62. Huang D., Swanson E., Lin P. et al. Optical coherence tomography // Science. – 1991. – Vol.254. – №5035. – P.1178-1181.
63. Hwang Y.H., Kim Y.Y. Correlation between optic nerve head parameters and retinal nerve fibre layer thickness measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in myopic eyes // Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. – 2012. – Vol.40. – №7. – P.713-720.
64. Jha B., Sharma R., Vanathi M. et al. Effect of phacoemulsification on measurement of retinal nerve fiber layer and optic nerve head parameters using spectral-domain-optical coherence tomography // J Ophthalmol. – 2017. – Vol.10. – №2. – P.91-95.
65. Jivrajka R., Shammas M.C., Boenzi T. et al. Variability of axial length, anterior chamber depth, and lens thickness in the cataractous eye // J. Cataract Refract. Surg. – 2008. – Vol.34. – №2. – P.289-294.
66. Kang S., Hong S., Im S. et al. Effect of myopia on the thickness of the retinal nerve fiber layer measured by Cirrus HD optical coherence tomography // Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. – 2010. – Vol.51. – №8. – P.4075-4083.
67. Kim Y., Kang M., Cho H., Lim H., Seong M. Comparative study of macular ganglion cell complex thickness measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in healthy eyes, eyes with preperimetric glaucoma, and eyes with early glaucoma // Jpn. J. Ophthalmol. – 2014. – Vol. 58. – №3. – Р. 244- 251.
68. Koh L., Ismail M., Yap S. et al. Effect of head tilt on repeatability of optic nerve head parameters using Cirrus spectral-domain optical coherence tomography // Int. J. Ophthalmol. – 2016. – Vol.9. – №8. – P.1170-1175.
69. Koh V., Tham Y., Cheung C. et al. Determinants of ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness measured by high-definition optical coherence tomography // Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. – 2012. – Vol.53. – №9. – P.5853-5859.
70. Kok P., van den Berg T., van Dijk H. et al. The relationship between the optical density of cataract and its influence on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured with spectral domain optical coherence tomography // Acta Ophthalmol. – 2013. – Vol.91. – №5. – P:418-424.
71. Kuang T., Liu C., Ko Y. et al. Distribution and associated factors of optic disc diameter and cup-to-disc ratio in an elderly Chinese population // J. Chin. Med. Assoc. – 2014. – Vol.77. – №4. – P.203-208.
72. Langenegger S., Funk J., Toteberg-Harms M. Reproducibility of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements using the eye tracker and the retest function of Spectralis SD-OCT in glaucomatous and healthy control eyes // Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. – 2011. – Vol. 52. – №6. – P.3338-3344.
73. Lee J., Kim N., Kim H. et al. Negative refraction power causes underestimation of peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness in spectraldomain optical coherence tomography // Br. J. Ophthalmol. – 2011. – Vol.95. – № 9. – P.1284-1289.
74. Lee W., Kim Y., Park K., Jeoung J. Trend-based analysis of ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness changes on optical coherence tomography in glaucoma progression // Ophthalmology. – 2017. – Vol.124. – №9. – Р.1383-1391.
75. Leung C., Cheng A., Chong K. et al. Optic disc measurements in myopia with optical coherence tomography and confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy // Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. – 2007. – Vol.48. – №7. –P.3178-3183.
76. Littmann H. Zur Bestimmung der wahren Grosse eines Objektes auf dem Hintergrund des lebenden Auges // Klin. Monatsbl. Augenheilkd. – 1982. – Bd.180. – №4. – S.286-289.
77. Lumbroso B., Rispoli M. Practical retinal OCT. 1st. edition. P.:Jaypee brothers medical pub,2014. – 110 p.
78. Malakar M., Askari S., Ashraf H. Optical coherence tomography assisted retinal nerve fibre layer thickness profile in high myopia // J. Clin. Diagn. Res. – Vol. 9. – №2. – P.NC01–NC03.
79. Mauschitz M., Roth F., Holz F. et al. The impact of lens opacity on SD-OCT retinal nerve fiber layer and Bruch's membrane opening measurements using the anatomical positioning system (APS) // Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. – 2017. – Vol.58. – №5. – P.2804-2809.
80. Medeiros F., Zangwill L., Bowd C. et al. Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer, optic nerve head, and macular thickness measurements for glaucoma detection using optical coherence tomography // Am. J. Ophthalmol. – 2005. – Vol.139. – №1. – P.44-55.
81. Mwanza J., Bhorade A., Sekhon N. et al. Effect of cataract and its removal on signal strength and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer optical coherence tomography measurements // J. Glaucoma. – 2011. – Vol.20. – №1. – P.37-43.
82. Mwanza J., Chang R., Budenz D. et al. Reproducibility of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and optic nerve head parameters measured with Cirrus HD-OCT in glaucomatous eyes // Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. – 2010. – Vol.51. – №11. – P.5724–5730.
83. Mwanza J., Durbin M., Budenz D. et al. Glaucoma diagnostic accuracy of ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness: comparison with nerve fiber layer and optic nerve head // Ophthalmology. – 2012. – Vol.119. – №6. – P.1151-1158.
84. Mwanza J., Sayyad F., Aref A., Budenz D. Rates of abnormal retinal nerve fiber layer and ganglion cell layer OCT scans in healthy myopic eyes: Cirrus versus RTVue // Ophthalmic Surg. Lasers Imaging. – 2012. – Vol.43. – №6. – P.67-74.
85. Nakatani Y., Higashide T., Ohkubo S. et al.Effect of cataract and its removal on ganglion cell complex thickness and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements by fourier-domain optical coherence tomography // J. Glaucoma. – 2013. – Vol.22. – №6. – P.447-455
86. Nakayama L., Bergamo V., Silva L., Moraes N. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) angiography of central retinal artery occlusion in the patent cilioretinal artery: a case report // Arq. Bras. Oftalmol. – 2018. – Vol.81. – №3. – P.242-246.
87. Namavari A., Zheng F., Motulsky E. et al. Swept-Source OCT Angiography Identifies Choroidal Neovascularization Arising From a Choroidal Nevus // Ophthalmic. Surg. Lasers Imaging Retina. – 2018. – Vol.49. – №5. – P.360-363.
88. Nidek Co., Ltd. Software for RS series Long Axial Length Normative Database. http://www.nidekintl.com/product/ophthaloptom/diagnostic/dia_retina/longaxiallength.html.
89. Oner V., Aykut V., Tas M. et al. Effect of refractive status on peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness: a study by RTVue spectral domain optical coherence tomography // Br. J. Ophthalmol. – 2013. – Vol.97. – №1. – P.75-79.
90. Patel N., Garcia B., Harwerth R. Influence of anterior segment power on the scan path and RNFL thickness using SD-OCT // Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. – 2012. – Vol.53. – №9. – P.5788-5798.
91. Pierro L., Gagliardi M., Iuliano L. et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness reproducibility using seven different OCT instruments // Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. –2012. – Vol.53. – №9. – P.5912-5920.
92. Puliafito C., Hee M., Lin C. et al. Imaging of macular diseases with optical coherence tomography // Ophthalmology. – 1995. – Vol.102. – №2. – P.217-229.
93. Rolle T., Dallorto L., Tavassoli M., Nuzzi R. Diagnostic ability and discriminant values of OCT-angiography parameters in early glaucoma diagnosis // Ophthalmic. Res. – 2018. – Vol.28. – P.1-10.
94. Salchow D., Hwang A., Li F., Dziura J. Effect of contact lens power on optical coherence tomography of the retinal nerve fiber layer // Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. – 2011. – Vol.5. – №3. – P.1650-1654.
95. Savini G., Barboni P., Parisi V., Carbonelli M. The influence of axial length on retinal nerve fibre layer thickness and optic-disc size measurements by spectral-domain OCT // Br. J. Ophthalmol. – 2012. – Vol.96. – №1. – P.57-61.
96. Savini G., Bellusci C., Carbonelli M. et al. Detection and quantification of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in optic disc edema using stratus OCT // Arch. Ophthalmol. – 2006. – Vol.124. – №8. – P.1111-1117.
97. Schulze A., Lamparter J., Pfeiffer N. et al. Diagnostic ability of retinal ganglion cell complex, retinal nerve fiber layer, and optic nerve head measurements by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography // Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. – 2011. – Vol.249. – №7. – P.1039-1045.
98. Schuman J., Hee M., Puliafito C. et al. Quantification of nerve fiber layer thickness in normal and glaucomatous eyes using optical coherence tomography // Arch. Ophthalmol. – 1995. – Vol.113. – № 5. – P.586-596.
99. Schuman J., Puliafito C., Fujimoto J. // Optical coherence tomography of ocular disease // Thorofare, USA. –Slack Inc. – 2004. – 714 p.
100. Seo S., Lee C.E., Jeong J.H. et al. Ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness according to myopia and optic disc area: a quantitative and three-dimensional analysis // BMC Ophthalmol. – 2017. – Vol.17:22
101. Sezgin Akcay B.I., Gunay B.O., Kardes E. et al. Evaluation of the ganglion cell complex and retinal nerve fiber layer in low, moderate, and high myopia: a study by RTVue spectral domain optical coherence tomography // Semin. Ophthalmol. – 2017. – Vol. 32. – №6. – P.682-688.
102. Sharma N., Sony P., Gupta A., Vajpayee R. Effect of laser in situ keratomileusis and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness // J. Cataract Refract. Surg. – 2006. – Vol. 32. – №3. – P.446-450.
103. Shpak A., Sevostyanova M., Ogorodnikova S., Shormaz I. Comparison of measurement error of Cirrus HD-OCT and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 in patients with early glaucomatous visual field defect // Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. – 2012. – Vol.250. – №2. – P.271-277.
104. Shufelt C., Fraser-Bell S., Ying-Lai M. et al. Refractive error, ocular biometry, and lens opalescence in an adult population: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study // Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. – 2005. – Vol.46. – №12. – P.4450-4460.
105. Snirivasan V., Wojtkowski M., Witkin A. et al. High definition and 3-dimensional imaging of macular pathologies with high-speed ultrahighresolution optical coherence tomography // Ophthalmology. – 2006. – Vol.113. – №11. – P.2054-2065.
106. Spaide R., Ohno-Matsui K., Yannuzzi L. (eds.) Pathologic Myopia. New York etc.: Springer, 2014.- 376 p.
107. Staurenghi G., Sadda S., Chakravarthy U., Spaide R.F. International Nomenclature for Optical Coherence Tomography (IN•OCT) Panel. Proposed lexicon for anatomic landmarks in normal posterior segment spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: the IN•OCT consensus // Ophthalmology. – 2014. – Vol. 121. – №8. – P. 1572-1578.
108. Swanson E., Izatt J., Hee M. et al. In vivo retinal imaging by optical coherence tomography // Opt Lett. – 1993. Vol.18. – №21. – P.1864-1866.
109. Takayama K., Hangai M., Durbin M. et al. A novel method to detect local ganglion cell loss in early glaucoma using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography // Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. – 2012. – Vol. 53. – No11. – Р. 6904-6913.
110. Takeyama A., Kita Y., Kita R., Tomita G. Influence of axial length on ganglion cell complex (GCC) thickness and on GCC thickness to retinal thickness ratios in young adults // Jpn. J. Ophthalmol. – 2014. – Vol.58. – №1. – P.86-93.
111. Tan O., Chopra V., Lu A.T. et al. Detection of macular ganglion cell loss in glaucoma by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography // Ophthalmology. – 2009. – Vol.116. – №12. – P.2305-2314.
112. Tas M., Oner V., Turkcu F.M. et al. Peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in hyperopic children // Optom. Vis. Sci. – 2012. – Vol.89. – №7. – P.1009-1013.
113. Topcon 3D OCT Series Normative Database. Topcon Medical Systems, Inc., 2011.- 8 p.
114. Tsai D.C., Huang N., Hwu J.J. et al. Estimating retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in normal schoolchildren with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography // Jpn. J. Ophthalmol. – 2012. – Vol.56. – №4. – P.362-370.
115. Ueda K., Kanamori A., Akashi A. et al. Effects of axial length and age on circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer and inner macular parameters measured by 3 types of SD-OCT instruments // J Glaucoma. – 2016. – Vol.25. – №4. – P. 383-389.
116. Wang Y., Du J., Yang M. et al. Distinct macular thickness changes after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery of age-related cataract and myopia with cataract // Sci. Rep. – 2018. – Vol.8. – №1:3279.
117. Williams K.M., Verhoeven V.J., Cumberland P. et al. Prevalence of refractive error in Europe: the European Eye Epidemiology (E³ ) Consortium // Eur. J. Epidemiol.- 2015.- Vol.30, № 4.- P.305-315.
118. Wojtkowski M., Leitgeb R., Kowalczyk A. et al. In vivo human retinal imaging by Fourier domain optical coherence tomography // J.Biomed.Opt. – 2002. – Vol.7. – №3. – P.457-463.
119. Yang Z., Tatham A., Weinreb R. et al. Diagnostic ability of macular ganglion cell inner plexiform layer measurements in glaucoma using swept source and spectral domain optical coherence tomography // PLoS One. – 2015. – Vol. 10. – №5. – e0125957.
120. Yang B., Ye C., Yu M. et al. Optic disc imaging with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: variability and agreement study with Heidelberg retinal tomograph // Ophthalmology. – 2012. – Vol. 119. – №9. – P.1852-1857.
121. Yanoff M., Duker J.S. Ophthalmology. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier, 2014. – p.337.
122.Yilmaz T., Karci A., Yilmaz I. et al. Long-Term Changes in Subfoveal Choroidal Thickness After Cataract Surgery // Med. Sci.Monit. – 2016. – Vol.22. – P.1566-1570.
123. Yoo Y.C., Lee C.M., Park J.H. Changes in peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer distribution by axial length // Optom. Vis. Sci. – 2012. – Vol.89. – №1. – P.4-11.
124. Yoshikawa Y., Shoji T., Kanno J. et al. Optic disc vessel density in nonglaucomatous and glaucomatous eyes: an enhanced-depth imaging optical coherence tomography angiography study // Clin. Ophthalmol. – 2018. – Vol.12. – P.1113-1119.
125. Zangwill L., Abunto T., Bowd C. et al. Scanning laser polarimetry retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements after LASIK // Ophthalmology. – 2005. – Vol.112. – №2. – P.200-207.
126. Zhang J., Zhou Y. Effect of suction on macular thickness and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness during LASIK used femtosecond laser and Moria M2 microkeratome // Int. J. Ophthalmol. – 2015. – Vol.8. – №4. – P.777-783.
Страница источника: 93-106
OAI-PMH ID: oai:eyepress.ru:article40815
Просмотров: 9014
Каталог
Продукции
Организации
Офтальмологические клиники, производители и поставщики оборудования
Издания
Периодические издания
Партнеры
Проекта Российская Офтальмология Онлайн




















